Tag Archives: murder

Is Hillary Clinton A Clinical Psychopath?

Is Hillary Clinton A Clinical Psychopath, Sociopath or At Least is She Capable of Murder?

I don’t know. You decide. Check out the following videos below in my brilliant playlist Psychology.


 

 

 

Share Button

Black Culture is Cancer

New Video “Let’s Get Real About Chicago” added to playlist Black Culture is Cancer


@GodsAutopsyCom

Posted a link from my Facebook, hopefully my Facebook account won’t be suspended.

This Culture and Ideology Needs Reform

Why do I say that black culture is cancer? It has nothing to do with blacks as people, or race, but it has everything to do with cultural norms and intolerance. There are whites, Latinos and Asians who suffer from black/hip hop cultures as well. There is overwhelming evidence that the hip hop and black cultures are saturated with far-right extremist social views, while being fiscally liberal or socialist. The vast majority of mid to lower income blacks in America have been and are quite Marxist, racist (racially biased), homophobic, anti-intellectual, a large percentage is still pro-life and they are generally socially conservative. Let’s just say that if 90% of blacks were quite wealthy, they’d be fans of Bush, Trump and Reagan.

Marxist-Inspired Delusions

I live and work in Chicago. I’ve grown up here. I went to many all-black schools. I understand the culture. I understand the intolerance of outside influences. Marxism, social justice advocacy and fuck-whitey attitudes have been waiting to happen. It’s the natural result of a country that doesn’t ridicule and attack all bad ideas and bad cultural norms equally. It’s safe to attack Christianity, it’s safe to attack Mormonism, it’s safe to attack flat-Earthers or conspiracy theorists, only because they’re either perceived to be ‘strong’ or dominant groups or are big enough to take the criticism, or the groups are small enough for us in the West to feel warranted in the attempt to stop their ideas from metastasizing. However, because there was a such thing as slavery, blacks have been socially and politically able to get away with murder. Imagine that black people are white people, and now debate, challenge or probe them the same way you would any white or Asian person. If you worked in media, and held every race, religion or culture to the same standards your career would be annihilated. Everyone knows it, especially SJW‘s. That’s why they love double standards; they’re fascists and proud of it. Be objective, and you would be ostracized and threatened by the left. Just ask Stacy Dash.

The reason skeptics and new atheists are quick to challenge and criticize groups like Black Lives Matter, is because these movements are based on bad ideas and harbor lies and nefarious behaviors.

Stand Up And Be Vocal

There are career goals of mine which I fear will be affected if more reasonable people don’t stand up. The good thing is that more and more people are talking about this issue, and treating black people fairly, that is, treating black culture and BLM exactly the way they would a white organization! Telling the truth. Unlike anything you see neo-liberals doing. Support me, and support anyone who wants to eliminate double standards by talking about these issues honestly, and NOT omitting certain facts (like Reuters, TYT,  any of the alphabet news outlets).

Objective and Honest Criticism is Racist

Nobody in media wants to be called a racist, so they ironically are all being racist by handling what minorities do with much much softer criticism than they would with whites or Asians. This mirrors the migrant issues in Europe. I’m 0% racist, and nothing I’ve written here should be controversial in a rational world. However, this isn’t a rational world. Be highly suspicious of the liberal ass who says “everyone’s a little bit racist.” Look up racist, and you’ll soon realize that your liberal friend IS a bit racist. He or she is treating minorities differently because of their race. Try treating people differently according to their actions.

Thanks to people like The Amazing Atheist, Atheism is Unstoppable, Sam Harris, Ben Shapiro, Dusty Smith etc, who take risks talking about this issue objectively.

@GodsAutopsyCom


Michelangelo’s The Creation of Atheist Adam – Adam Gives God The Finger – from God’s Autopsy | @GodsAutopsyCom @GodsAutopsyGear #GodsAutopsyGear #ChallengeFaith

|

Share Button

Duck Dynasty Star and the Slaughtered Raped Atheists

Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson’s thought experiment gone wrong. 

eric-ga – by @GodsAutopsyCom 


Phil Robertson is probably not as insane as he sounds in the video below, just a bad philosopher perhaps. At a prayer breakfast in Florida, Phil attempts a reductio ad absurdum argument for the immorality of secularism and atheism. He wants to say that an atheist can’t logically possess morals because the atheist has no objective moral standard to base them on (as provided in the Bible). Yet, Phil’s straw atheist family couldn’t plausibly exist, if they did, they most likely wouldn’t have survived long enough for Phil’s invaders to break into their home and commit these crimes (if you cared about absolutely nothing, you’d routinely walk into streets, never checking for traffic). You see, if the atheist parents didn’t care about life and well-being, they wouldn’t have bothered getting married in the first place, and they wouldn’t have ever bothered feeding or raising their children.

It seems that Phil is being intellectually dishonest; he can’t imagine morality without a god, so somehow no one else can possess morality without his god having authored it (where’s the free will in this model?). Is he saying that all atheists are either lying about their non-belief or lying to themselves? I wouldn’t be surprised. I’ve heard this argument before: the argument that morality and the feeling of a spiritual presence is apparent to us all. It’s the assumption there’s a god-shaped hole carved into all our hearts. If this were true, that we just know right from wrong, how would you explain the world’s extant contradictory religions with contradicting moral codes?

See Phil’s clip below: 

Phil Robertson: “Maybe if you just buy enough healthcare insurance, that’a keep you out of the ground. I don’t think so… save you money… You got a six-foot hole waiting on you if you have all the healthcare you can buy. You say, ‘is it going to keep me out of the ground?’ No sir. It’s a problem, and you know something, you can’t solve it.

“Just like you can’t see in your sin problem. Oh, I-I mean, I don’t know, this conscience thing. I mean, we just dreamed it up! There’s no right, there’s no wrong. There’s no good, there’s no evil. I’ll make a bet with you. Two guys break into an atheist’s home. He has a little atheist wife and two little atheist daughters. Two guys break into his home and tie him up in a chair and gag him. And then they take his two daughters in front of him and rape both of them and then shoot them. And they take his wife and they decapitate her head off in front of him. And then they can look at him and say, ‘Isn’t it great that I don’t have to worry about being judged? Isn’t it great that there’s nothing wrong with this?! There’s no right or wrong, now is it, dude?’ Then you take a sharp knife and take his manhood and hold it in front of him, say, ‘wouldn’t it be something if this was something wrong with this? But, you’re the one who says there’s no God, there’s no right, there’s no wrong. So, we’re just having fun! We’re sick in the head! Have a nice day.’

“If it happened to them, they probably would say, ‘something about this just ain’t right.'”


What Christians don’t understand is that the Universe doesn’t need purpose, it doesn’t need objective rights, wrongs or moral standards to exist. The Universe exists simply because it can. If objects, animals and humans exist, we can still have laws and morals constructed by society to keep us in line. Secular Humanists such as myself base our morals on what contributes to human well-being. The Bible, however, is a terrible source for morals, and is in no way a source for objective moral standards.

A reductio is only valid when it’s logically possible.

See: #10 – Where Do You Get Your Morals?

eric-ga – by @GodsAutopsyCom – godsautopsy@gmail.com 

number of visits trackinstall tracking code

BIBLE FACTS stickers from GodsAutopsy.com
Share Button