Scalpel to the Scriptures Vol 06

Scalpel to the Scriptures: Vol 6

Every week I’m critiquing biblical scriptures. Last week: Genesis 3:8-24


STTS Archive | previous | next


 @GodsAutopsyCom | gods autopsy on fb

Genesis Chapter 4:1-26 (KJV)

And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.

And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.

William Bouguereau, Cain and Abel, 1861, Oil on canvas

And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord. Keep God happy by bringing him offerings, because it’ll be a while before Jesus comes to offer himself as the final ritual sacrifice.

And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering: –  Isn’t there somewhere else in the bible that says that God is not a “respecter” of persons? Oh, right, Acts 10:34 – “Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons“. I guess God is no respecter of consistency.

But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell. – Why?

And the Lord said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?

If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.

And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him. – Out of spite, or out of the desire to be respected and honored by his god? It seems God and Cain have a lot in common.

And the Lord said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper? – Still wondering if God really likes asking rhetorical questions, or if he was off somewhere watching badgers mate on another continent.

10 And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground. – Abel’s blood crieth, yet god doeth nothing to revive him. God is not a respecter of blood, unless it’s in the form of a burnt offering.

11 And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood from thy hand;

12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth. – God is all about life-long punishment. Is this Cain’s first offense? If God was watching over Cain his whole life, how did he become so evil? 

13 And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear. – Of course Cain would say that…

14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me. – When did the Earth become so populated? Also, how are they going to know about the murder?

15 And the Lord said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him. – God protects Cain by issuing a threat of sevenfold vengeance. Odd justice.

16 And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden. – “Out from the presence of the Lord”? So the land of Nod was like the Bahrain of Saudi Arabia? If others on Earth could commit the ‘sin’ of slaying Cain, then the story of Adam and Eve’s original sin is turning out to be a major contradiction.

17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch. – It’s funny listening to Christians talk about all the children Adam and Eve were supposed to have had. I’ve got some relatives I’d like to talk to about this.

18 And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech.

God is Loving? Well, you know, that’s just like your opinion man. – by God’s Autopsy

19 And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. – “God, Zillah isn’t obeying my every command, may I striketh her?” – Lamech

20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle.

21 And his brother’s name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ.

22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah. – Will Two-Ballcain ever muster the boldness to become twice as evil as Cain?

23 And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.

24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold. – …and, why is this?

25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. – I’m guessing they had a great deal of children before Cain and Abel.

26 And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the Lord. – Tell your Christian friends and relatives to read their bibles.


STTS Archive | previous | next


“Bible Facts” stickers by GodsAutopsy

Must See Places In Paris

Share Button

Are You a Tolerant Or Anti-Theist Atheist

Being an anti-theist simply means you think the world would be better off sans religious belief. I believe all religion to be harmful if believed, yet I can still bring myself to appreciate the world’s religions as sources of mythical fantasy and literature.

@GodsAutopsyCom

Multiple Choice

How do you feel about calling a small child religious? Example: Saying, "My Muslim / Catholic / Mormon child" is...

The likes of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris are…

Is Islam a religion of peace?

“In God We Trust” on U.S. currency is…

Would you rather your doctor accept evolution?

How important is it to come out as an atheist in today’s society?

If a religious child asks you questions about science/atheism you…

Education in science and philosophy often lead to agnosticism and/or atheism.

Everyone should be left alone to believe what they want to believe.

Fundamentalists are…

Page 1 out of 1

 


Christopher Hitchens Miracle Toast by God’s Autopsy

url and counting visits

Share Button

Headlines: Bill Contradicts Hillary on Emails

Bill Clinton contradicts Hillary on email claims

Religion Is Disappearing. That’s Great for Politics. – by Michael Shermer

Is Yoga Religious? In India, It’s a Vexed Question – Wall Street Journal

Eddie Izzard will run for London mayor as fearless atheist

How Rand Paul Has Already Changed the 2016 Race -TIME

Prolific British Actor Christopher Lee Dies at Age 93 – ABC


 

Share Button

Intelligence Quizzes

REASONABLE INTELLIGENCE QUIZZES

Can We Guess Your Level Of Education?

Ethical Philosophy Quiz

How Logical Are You?

How Logical Are You? (mathematical)”

How Logical Are You REALLY?


shirts, mugs, stickers, phone cover, pillows, watches, skirts, scarves & more from godsautopsy

 

Share Button

Scalpel to the Scriptures Vol 05

Scalpel to the Scriptures: Vol 5

Every week I’m critiquing biblical scriptures. Last week: Genesis 3:1-7


STTS Archive | Previous | Next


 @GodsAutopsyCom| gods autopsy on fb

Genesis Chapter 3:8-24 (KJV)

And they heard the voice of Jehovah God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of Jehovah God amongst the trees of the garden. – Are we meant to believe that they could hear God’s voice and hid before he could see them? Read your bible if you think that OT God is omnipresent.

And Jehovah God called unto the man, and said unto him, Where art thou?

10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself. – Where’s Eve?

11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? – Beautiful language style.

12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. – This is a real form of the objectification of women; Eve was merely given to Adam as a helper or servant (an help meet). Adam was clearly made to be superior and Eve was created so that he could not be alone.

13 And Jehovah God said unto the woman, What is this thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. – That’s right, the serpent beguiled her. Is God going to demonstrate some forgiveness? No, that’s too hard for God.

14 And Jehovah God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, cursed art thou above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: – Was “dust shalt thou eat” a metaphor? Had the author ever seen a snake eating a mouse?

15 and I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed: he shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. – I don’t understand this verse, but it may mean that Adam will eventually conquer Satan by crushing his head. [1]

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy pain and thy conception; in pain thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. – As if God originally never intended for Adam to rule over his wife. And as if childbirth would have been peachy otherwise.

17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in toil shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; – Most people interpret this as follows: because you didn’t respect me, you’re cursed and you will have to toil and struggle forever. The huge contradiction between this verse and the modern world is that capitalism exists, and some men don’t have to toil. A Christian will say, “yeah but people have to work hard and study before they can earn a living”. Working hard and studying doesn’t apply to rich kids, something that was unimaginable at the time this book was written. 

18 thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;

19 in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. – …or a blood clot. Depends on which book you read. Also, which part of that book you read.

20 And the man called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living. – God decides to name the unnamed property of Adam only after fruitgate. Women in the bible were obviously second-class citizens from page one.

21 And Jehovah God made for Adam and for his wife coats of skins, and clothed them. – Were they tailored to look fashionable, or were they baggy? Did the coats come with hoodies?

22 And Jehovah God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil; and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever – God could have killed Adam and started over again, but chose not to. He deliberately wanted every generation of man to suffer. A spiteful shit was he. The god of Genesis was supposedly incapable of taking away Adam’s knowledge of good and evil. How can any sane person not think this is all myth?!

23 therefore Jehovah God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. – “Suffer all your days, but don’t forget, you still have to till the ground” – Jehovah God

24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden the Cherubim, and the flame of a sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life. – Obviously the author thought there was a garden within which lies a tree of life. Where did they think the garden was, and what did they think happened to it? Did they think the flood destroyed a tree of eternal life?

source 1: https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/1571-crushing-the-serpents-head-the-meaning-of-genesis-3-15


STTS Archive | Previous | Next

shirts, mugs, stickers, phone cover, pillows, watches, skirts, scarves & more from godsautopsy

url and counting visitsurl and counting visits

Share Button

Duggar Interviews

This post will be my first Coroner’s ReportThe Coroner’s Report will be my first-thoughts on news and events.

eric-ga – by @GodsAutopsyCom 

Megyn Kelly – Full interview with Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar

Jessa Duggar and Jill Duggar Megyn Kelly Full Interview

Before posting this Coroner’s Report, I’d already watched the two interviews and noticed the Duggar sisters Jill and Jessa think 2/3rd’s families go through similar incidents of, I’m guessing, family or brother/sister molestation. I’ll have to look up some statistics because this doesn’t sound realistic at all. I searched a handful of websites on the matter, and it was very hard to find any evidence suggesting the 2/3rd’s statistic is true.

The Child Molestation Research and Prevention Institute has this to say about the definition of a child molester:

A child molester is any older child or adult who touches a child for his or her own sexual gratification.

Child molestation is the act of sexually touching a child.

A child is a girl or boy who is 13 years of age or younger.

What’s the age difference between a molester and a child? It is five years, so a 14-year-old “older child” sexually touching a nine-year-old is an example. This is the accepted medical definition.“[childmolestationprevention.org]

It’s like the sisters want to minimize the severity of the issue by saying that it’s common.  If child incest molestation were that common I would be mortified. Why are they so horrified that their privacy was violated if they think America has this problem? They should be taking the opportunity, as figures in the media, to help fight and prevent such abuse. Instead, they’re crying about what got leaked, as if that’s a worse crime than child abuse.

The deranged mentality of the pious, is to focus on biblical teachings like forgiveness, even in the face of heinous acts, one must convince themselves that they can forgive everyone for anything. If Jesus were an actual person, he was a monster. He taught that the dismissal of an invisible tyrant was unforgivable, but rape and murder could always be forgiven. That the rejection of God was worth spending an eternity in the worst torture one could possibly imagine. If death isn’t good enough, then torture is revenge, and that revenge is only for disobedience.

I think the Duggar family was so preoccupied with making sure they forgave their son, that they risked their other children’s safety in order to adhere to their Christian values. However, I want to be clear, this is a horrendous situation for any parent or family to have to go through, and it seems like they did the best they could with the values and resources they had to work with. But Christian values and organizations are terrible moral and institutional resources to turn to. Christian morals and values are disgusting in so many areas.

AND THAT’S MY CORONER’S REPORT

 

web page hit counters codes Freeweb page hit counters codes Free

Share Button

Scalpel to the Scriptures Vol 04

Scalpel to the Scriptures: Vol 4

Critiquing biblical scriptures. Last week, I covered Genesis 1:25-31, and Genesis 2:1-25, this week: Genesis 3:1-7

STTS Archive | Previous | Next


 @GodsAutopsyCom

Genesis Chapter 3 – verses 1-7 (KJV)

Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? – Had God only warned Eve that talking beasts are sketchy. Had God only warned Eve that there was a such thing as a bullshitter, there’d be no babies born with bone cancer. Oops, too bad. Blame Eve. Remember the film “The Invention of Lying”? Can you punish those who believe a lie and act on it without actually understanding what it means to lie?

And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: – All the while God watches the show as if it were Game of Thrones (with more nudity).

For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. – Because curiosity and knowing about the world is apparently a sin in the bible. See the tower of Babel for example. The Bible is a constant reminder to its believers to keep your head in the sand. If the story of Adam and Eve is not an allegory for blind obedience, I don’t know what is.

Creepy serpent guy seen wrapped around the tree is the reason some children are born with bone cancer.

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. – Why would the tree be pleasant to the eyes? Is it because God wants the tree to be tempting? The tree should be ugly, black, thorny and hard to access. Nope, God wants to test man. If you’re a Christian and you think God wasn’t going to keep tempting man again and again until they finally gave in, then you probably never gave much thought to this myth. And don’t blame it on the serpent, God surely created him too, knowing he was in the garden.

You must concede that the god of the Old Testament was not omniscient and omnipresent. The OT god contradicts the omniscient, omnipotent god Christians believe in today.

And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. – When you pick up a science book, you risk opening your eyes. When you pick up an apple, you risk burning in hell fire for eternity. How can you argue that Yahweh is moral?


STTS Archive | Previous | Next


my website visitorsweb page hit counters codes Free

“Bible Facts” stickers by GodsAutopsy
Share Button

logic and reason are harmful to faith